FIR Filed Against Two in Shimla for Illegally Seizing Ancestral Property

Shimla, April 17: A serious case of ancestral property usurpation has surfaced in the Kotkhai police station jurisdiction of Shimla district, prompting police to register an FIR against two individuals. The action follows a complaint filed by three brothers—Jheena, Bhagat C. Thakur, and Ramesh, residents of Shimla, who allege that their relatives fraudulently grabbed their late father’s property.

The brothers claim that the accused, residents of Kotkhai, tampered with official documents and managed to get the entire ownership of the land transferred to themselves, bypassing the legal rights of the actual heirs. When the victims confronted them, they were allegedly threatened with consequences.

Revenue Department’s Report Triggers Action

The complainants had earlier approached the Revenue Department, requesting an inquiry into the matter. After examining the land records and transaction details, the department confirmed discrepancies. Based on this report, the police registered a case under multiple serious charges.

Sections of IPC Invoked

The case has been lodged under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC):

• Section 420 – Cheating

• Section 406 – Criminal breach of trust

• Section 506 – Criminal intimidation

• Section 34 – Common criminal intention

Police Begin Formal Investigation

A senior police officer confirmed that a detailed investigation is now underway. “We are verifying the authenticity of the property documents, and both the accused and the complainants will be questioned,” the officer said.

An Alarming Trend

Incidents of property fraud involving ancestral land are becoming increasingly common in Himachal Pradesh, especially in rural areas. Legal experts have emphasized the need for stricter enforcement of land rights and greater awareness among families to avoid such disputes.

Key Highlights:

• Property belonged to late Layak Ram Thakur, father of the complainants

• Accused allegedly used forgery to seize ownership

• FIR registered following confirmation from Revenue Department

• Police to question all parties involved

The case brings renewed focus on the need for transparent land record systems and timely legal recourse in property-related matters.