The Himachal Pradesh government has introduced a significant bill in the state assembly that seeks to exclude the period employees served on a contractual basis from being counted for seniority and financial benefits. The Himachal Pradesh Government Employees Recruitment and Service Conditions Bill, presented by Chief Minister Sukhwinder Singh Sukhu on Wednesday, addresses both financial and administrative complications related to the inclusion of contractual service in seniority calculations.
Exclusion of Contractual Service from Seniority Calculations
If passed, the bill will ensure that employees’ seniority will only be calculated after their service is regularized, excluding the time they served under a contract. This reform is set to apply retroactively from 2003, the year when contractual appointments were first introduced in the state. The government justified this move by highlighting the significant financial burden associated with including contractual periods in seniority calculations. Granting seniority and financial benefits based on contractual service would not only necessitate substantial financial outlays but would also require a review and revision of seniority lists for the past two decades.
Financial Burden and Legal Disputes
The introduction of this bill is partly a response to mounting legal challenges and the ongoing financial strain these cases have caused. One notable case, Taj Mohammad vs. Lekhraj, resulted in a court directive compelling the government to grant seniority benefits to contractual employees. Senior officials have pointed out that similar cases are being heard frequently, leading to further strain on the state’s resources and administrative capacity.
The bill seeks to clarify that the agreements signed by employees at the time of their contractual appointment explicitly stated that their contractual tenure would not count toward seniority or financial benefits. However, the inclusion of contractual employees in the recruitment and promotion rules had blurred the lines between regular and contractual service, leading to confusion and legal complications.
Reinforcing the Distinction Between Regular and Contractual Employment
Grounded in Article 309 of the Constitution, the proposed bill aims to draw a clear distinction between regular and contractual employees. It emphasizes that contractual appointments were always intended to be different from regular employment, and therefore, the benefits provided to regular employees should not be extended to those on contract. This legislation will safeguard the interests of regular employees while ensuring the state’s financial resources are used efficiently.
Employees-recruitment-bill-Himachal-
Clarity and Consistency in Employee Policies
The government views the bill as a step toward harmonizing the interests of both regular and contractual employees. It aims to streamline recruitment and service conditions by providing much-needed clarity on employee benefits and terms of service. Once the bill is passed, it will put an end to the practice of counting contractual service for seniority and financial benefits, relieving the state from both legal complications and fiscal challenges while promoting a more consistent approach to employee policies.